I think my only concern with this is (g)fortran. The C/C++ compiler situation seems pretty stable, but doesn’t the fortran problem still exist? I do not use any package managers on my systems, so home-brew and the like aren’t useful to me.
> On Sep 23, 2021, at 15:17 , Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32532 proposes to remove these packages as > not needed, and a huge time sink for everyone involved. > > Rationale: nowadays every platform that Sage supports has said tools (or > their equivalents - e.g. clang/clang++ in case of macOS and FreeBSD) > available, if not outright as a system package, but surely with a very > minimal effort. > > There is no need to carry this baggage forward. > Moreover, it seems that Sage is the only Python library/platform around > which (potentially) vendors gcc/g++/gfortran. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq0hsaf3SR-78Wajb_OdYjZq1MyReRH2vcwSO%2BU7CzLtYw%40mail.gmail.com. -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds -------- Men are from Earth. Women are from Earth. Deal with it. -------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/DCE3ACDD-C65D-40B5-8AD9-409400C863AE%40mac.com.
