As someone who contributed to those (and literally created the gfortran package when I pushed for enabling clang support on OS X) I welcome their demise. I’ll review their removal with pleasure if you need it.
François > On 24/09/2021, at 10:17, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32532 proposes to remove these packages as > not needed, and a huge time sink for everyone involved. > > Rationale: nowadays every platform that Sage supports has said tools (or > their equivalents - e.g. clang/clang++ in case of macOS and FreeBSD) > available, if not outright as a system package, but surely with a very > minimal effort. > > There is no need to carry this baggage forward. > Moreover, it seems that Sage is the only Python library/platform around > which (potentially) vendors gcc/g++/gfortran. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq0hsaf3SR-78Wajb_OdYjZq1MyReRH2vcwSO%2BU7CzLtYw%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/7C219AEF-FD68-4D19-B31F-1115FFAA5BB3%40gmail.com.
