On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:36 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here we go with 2.10.2.alpha2. It fixes a whole bunch of doctest > failures > and also finishes the merging of the graph theory code. > > The tarball [209MB] is available at the usual place: > > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-2.10.2/sage-2.10.2.alpha2.tar > > The doctest failures in detail: > > const.tex: special function failure - see #2222 > > sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/groups/group.pyx - #2224 > sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/misc/functional.py - #2226 > sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/modules/quotient_module.py - #2230 > > --- > > sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/padics/padic_ZZ_pX_CR_element.pyx > > 4 times "NotImplementedError: log is not quite working yet" - David > Roe might or might not have the resources to implement the missing > bits. > > --- > > sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial.pyx > > File "multi_polynomial.pyx", line 256: > sage: R(S.0) > Expected: > BROKEN -- FIX ME > Got: > p > > I am hazy on the details, but the result is not correct, but it was > unclear during SD7 what the result should be or what causes the bug. > > --- > > sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/padics.py > > File "padics.py", line 947: > sage: E.padic_sigma_truncated(5, 10) > Expected: > O(5^11) + (1 + O(5^10))*t + O(5^9)*t^2 + (3 + 2*5^2 + 3*5^3 + > 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + O(5^8))*t^3 + O(5^7)*t^4 + (2 + 4*5^2 + 4*5^3 + 5^4 + > 5^5 + O(5^6))*t^5 + O(5^5)*t^6 + (2 + 2*5 + 5^2 + 4*5^3 + O(5^4))*t^7 > + O(5^3)*t^8 + (1 + 2*5 + O(5^2))*t^9 + O(5^1)*t^10 + O(t^11) > Got: > O(5^11) + (1 + O(5^10))*t + O(5^9)*t^2 + (3 + 2*5^2 + 3*5^3 + > 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + O(5^8))*t^3 + O(5^7)*t^4 + (2 + 4*5^2 + 4*5^3 + 5^4 + > 5^5 + O(5^6))*t^5 + O(5^5)*t^6 + (2 + 2*5 + 5^2 + 4*5^3 + O(5^4))*t^7 > + O(5^3)*t^8 + (1 + 2*5 + O(5^2))*t^9 + O(5)*t^10 + O(t^11) > > Note the difference in printing: O(5^1)*t^10 vs. O(5)*t^10 > > Once we fix all the above issue 2.10.2 will be release. I am > optimitic > and think that this will be the case in the next 24 hours.
I've placed test logs here as usual: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/build/tests/2.10.2.alpha2/ The genus2reduction and const.tex doctest failures are still there: Total time for all tests: 8.4 seconds sage -t const.tex ***************************** ***************************************** File "const.py", line 4626: : bessel_K(3,2,100) Expected: 0.64738539094863415315923557097 Got: 0.647385390948634 ---- genus2reduction was broken by the new makefile. On ppc osx 10.4 there is another failure: File "const.py", line 3200: : G = E.abelian_group(); G Expected: (Multiplicative Abelian Group isomorphic to C5, ((1 : 0 : 1),)) Got: (Multiplicative Abelian Group isomorphic to C5, ((0 : 0 : 1),)) --- Also on ppc: sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/functions/special.py ******************************************** ************************** File "special.py", line 506: sage: bessel_J(3,10,"scipy") Expected: 0.0583793793052... - 1.65905485529...e-17*I Got: 0.0583793793052000 - 1.60046919179000e-17*I ********************************************************************** 1 items had failures: Also on OSX 10.5 PPC: [5.1 s] sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/totallyreal_rel.py*** *** Error: TIMED OUT! *** *** *** *** Error: TIMED OUT! *** *** [181.1 s] sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/unit_group.py [5.3 s] So I think the totallyreal_rel.py doctests need to be changed (need some #long's or...?) Or maybe there really is a big problem. I don't know. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
