On Feb 21, 10:24 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Is there anything I can do to help with 1946? It's now a month since
> I wrote that stuff and the more releases that go by before it is
> merged the harder it will be. Or will it be easier (for you!) to wait
> until 2.10.2 is released without it and then redo the patch based on
> that?
>
> John
Hi John,
we tried applying the patch and I get massive rejects in the
docstrings with your patch series as well as the bundle William posted
against 2.10.2.alpha1. Those rejects are usually easy to resolve
manually, but I am not somebody with enough expertise to do that. It
also looks like newlines might be involved somehow, which does
surprise me.
If you have a rebased series of patches against 2.10.2.alpha2 I am
sure that they will either go in before 2.10.2.final or right at the
start of the 2.10.3 release cycle, i.e. before anything else in that
area has a change to be merge, so that there is 0% potential for merge
conflict.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
