On Friday, November 6, 2020 at 1:32:32 PM UTC-5, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> On Thursday, November 5, 2020 at 7:51:05 PM UTC-8, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have not noticed it before, but  *sage-9.2-OSX_10.15.7-x86_64.app.dmg 
>>> <http://mirrors.mit.edu/sage/osx/intel/sage-9.2-OSX_10.15.7-x86_64.app.dmg> 
>>> does 
>>> not work *in macos 10.15.7. !!!!!!
>>>
>>> I do not understand how a sage for macos 10.15.7 that does not works on 
>>> macos 10.15.7 has been released. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> Unfortunately I don't think we check many of the binaries.  They are 
>> "just produced"; actually checking they all work can't be automated and can 
>> be pretty time-consuming (waiting for unpacking etc.).  
>>
>
> As discussed most recently in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29710, we 
> should start by eliminating the distribution of the mac app.
>
>
Totally orthogonal to what the user was reporting, and I just want to make 
that VERY clear to anyone reading this later when the inevitable complaints 
about the dropping of the app come.  

"Viable open source competitor" in the mission statement should include 
this type of functionality.  That said, I know that the forces against 
actually having user-friendly interfaces for newbies that don't rely on 
having an internet connection are too big. (I do not consider command line 
friendly to true newcomers.)  Primarily the lack of any interested 
developers having experience/interest in writing more Mac GUI code to 
update :-(  Ideally fixing this would be a GSOC project, but who would the 
mentor be?  (I do not have said expertise, unfortunately.)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/37495fe5-634f-44ac-9e94-b84e3df4b7c6o%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to