On Thursday, July 23, 2020 at 2:39:09 PM UTC-7, Spencer Dembner wrote: > > It may be related, but I don't think it's exactly the same issue. For > example, the following, involving no square root, still leaks memory: > > for i in [1,..,20000]: > if i%100 == 0: > print(i); > print(get_memory_usage()); > C = continued_fraction(pi^i); > C.denominator(100); > > It's showing the same behaviour in that there are loads of sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalFieldElement elements piling up, so I think it's quite likely that the root cause is something similar to Trac #27185 <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Ftrac.sagemath.org%2Fticket%2F27185&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHTiEHJNRNAs5UdvNz_6OP8UuasUg> .
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/2d083fe7-0975-40ae-b07a-1f49679c8b8fo%40googlegroups.com.
