On Thursday, July 23, 2020 at 3:30:48 PM UTC-7, Dave Morris wrote: > > I think this last example is related to trac #27536 > <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27536> (conversion of mathematical > constant such as pi to RDF leaks memory). There is still a memory leak > (but smaller, I think) if pi^i is replaced with pi, but I don't see a > memory leak if pi^i is replaced with RDF.pi(). I also don't see a leak > with RDF.pi()^i, but I quickly get a RecursionError ("maximum recursion > depth exceeded"). I know almost nothing about memory leaks, but I just > wanted to point out that I noticed some related issues that might possibly > provide an explanation (and certainly seem to be relevant to a complete > solution). > > That could well play a role too, but there are actually objects leaking on the python heap, which is not happening with trac #27536. <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27536>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/53762ffc-ad69-4a0c-8013-9a9904660df1o%40googlegroups.com.
