Hi, Apparently none of the screenshots made by a GHOP contestant are allowed on Wikipedia because they contain parts of the Mac OS X interface and there isn't a notice that states that screenshots of the Sage Notebook can be released under a CC license.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_January_21#Image:Sagecontourplot.png On Jan 21, 4:30 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 21, 2008 1:58 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 20, 2008 10:50 PM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The message that started this is > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_Ja... > > > > If this person's is right that you can't release ascreenshotof the > > > Sage Notebook under a CC license then I'm worried that the Sage > > > documentation can't actually be licensed under CC-by-sa since it > > > includes code from docstrings in the GPLed Sage code. > > > That's an excellent question. I personally think that all docstrings in > > Sage > > should be viewed as part of the Sage "documentation", and > > hence also be licensed under CC, since we state that all the documentation > > of Sage is so licensed (this could be a dual license -- it's under CC > > and GPL). > > Does anybody disagree? We're the copyright holders on 100% of > > this stuff, so it's up to us to decide. > > This sounds good to me - SAGE docs under a dual license. > > > > > -- william --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
