On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 07:45:34AM -0700, mabshoff wrote: > > mabshoff: Are you sure you ran doc-tests with the *patched* version of > > sage? > > Because that doc-test wasn't even in the vanilla version. > > > > Everything is possible, but I am fairly sure that the behavior of the > doctests only changes if the patch made it in. Can you check that your > patch applied against rc1 passes doctests? I will apply it provided > the patch doesn't get shot by William.
My point is this: The doc-test you reference is not even in vanilla 2.8.10. That specific doc-test is new in the patch (and the fact that it failed indicates that the patch was applied). However, the patch failed as the text you "Got:" is what vanilla 2.8.10 actually does -- which means to me that you doc-tested the new source code with binary that did not have the patch. I will verify against rc1 and report back, but it'll be awhile (2 hours) since that means that I need to build an rc1 and patch and doc-test. -- Joel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
