On Thursday 17 May 2007 07:49, William Stein wrote: > On 5/16/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rather than implementing subs/substitute in every class where it makes > > sense > > (polynomials/rational functions/non-commutative polynomials) I thought > > it makes > > more sense to move it up to sage/structure/element. Here is a patch > > illustrating the concept. > > Martin/William: do you think this is a good approach?
> Yes, definitely. It's very sensible in my opinion. I am not so sure. Moving it up to Element means that it shows up in tab-completion (polluting the method list) even though it is not supported for most Elements. Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
