When I looked carefully at my sage -upgrade output, I noticed a hg "rollback" caused by the error indicated in my previous email. This is why I didn't get any of the patches without moving sage-main first. Perhaps the hg repository in the sage-2.4.1.1 is corrupted?
- Robert On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:16 PM, Joel B. Mohler wrote: > > Actually, what I get after a sage -upgrade didn't include the > patch. Did > my -upgrade go south? There should not be a > number_field_element.py and > there should be a number_field_element.pyx in the sage/rings/ > number_field > directory. > > -- > Joel > > On Wednesday 28 March 2007 10:30, William Stein wrote: >> On 3/28/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> I've released sage-2.4.1. It has: >>>> >>>> * d roe: massively updated p-adics code >>>> * r bradshaw: much misc code; Coleman integration >>>> * misc bug fixes >>> >>> What about my number field pyrexification? >>> Joel >> >> I forgot to mention Joel Mohler's excellent contribution to number >> field >> arithmetic, which is also included in SAGE-2.4.1.1. Now basic >> arithmetic is much faster than it was before. >> >> William >> >> > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
