Regarding (3), I'm arguing that is what is in your best interest. As > far as I know, almost *nobody* > has tried working with the SAGE notebook using > notebook(system="gap") > so if things don't work optimally when doing so, it's not surprising. > Moreover, I want to emphasize that it would be possible to create a > SAGE/GAP Notebook > that would only require Python and some Python libraries, and very > little of the rest of SAGE. > Indeed, when the SAGE notebook runs, it loads only a small part of the > SAGE libraries. > Nobody has made a standalone Python package version of the SAGE > notebook, which installs into an existing Python install, but it would > not only be possible, but would be reasonably easy. It would mainly > require creating a modified setup.py. In any case, it would be > *vastly* *vastly* easier than doing (1) above, and certainly much > easier than (2) as well. I haven't done it, because I have no need to > personally.
Regarding the above, I wanted to mention that Dorian and I are very interested in a general standalone notebook. We have been working on this, focusing on: security, generality, cross-browser compatibility, and supporting multiple users building off of Twisted, Mochikit, and SQLite. Alex --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
