On 2/26/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Shouldn't the error on a quad double be way smaller than this? I'm > not sure what specific numbers you're operating on, but if your > answers are on the order of 10^0, then shouldn't you have around 63 > decimal digits of accuracy, rather than just 4 more orders of > magnitude? Wouldn't an error of 1e-17 be like using mpfr with ~60+ bits?
I must have somehow miscompiled the library (again). I will look at it more closely later. didier --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
