On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:17:00 -0800, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> May I suggest that sloane_functions be split into pieces, perhaps one
> sequence per file? It takes for ever to run the tests, and it's
> just... bulky. Too big.
Yes. Do it. Put them in a subdirectory:
sage/combinat/sloane/
This will *not* helpw with running tests though -- it will take even longer!
The solution for that is to not have any tests that take a long time. If
they do, properly mark them with a comment
sage: ... # long time
so they don't get run by default.
> Also, do we envision the network code in databases/sloan eventually
> being unified with the sloane_functions code?
Sure. Any proposals as to how?
William
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
