On Jan 4, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
I'm happy if people think they can write wrappers etc in time, to have
SAGE just work directly with FLINT objects. Polynomial multiplication
should be working by Monday-ish. But how I proceed might depend on
what
people think about this. So, should I:
a) Try and incorporate FLINT into the SAGE pari; or
b) Keep writing FLINT and let someone else figure out how to
incorporate FLINT directly.
Clearly (b) is far easier. There exist people (such as myself :-))
who know the FLINT and SAGE codebases intimately. Forcefeeding things
into PARI is going to be much harder, since we don't (as far as I am
aware) have any PARI authors around (?). My vote is to start with
(b), and come back to (a) later, when FLINT is looking more solid.
David
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
