On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:26:41 -0800, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I could, but if I'm not going to embed the results in docstrings I'd > have to find them at run-time, and the hassles of doing that are > probably worse than the hassles of parsing in the first place.
You could pickle (as .pyxc files?) the data structures that sagex creates at runtime. > On an unrelated note: how do I alter what ipython does for ? and ?? > (this might be a question for Fernando Perez). We have code in > server.support that duplicates what ipython does; we should factor that > out and modify ipython to run our unified, sagex enhanced, version. See the end of misc/interpreter.py. It is already factored out -- when you do ? or ?? from Ipython, it just calls a SAGE version, which is the one for server support. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
