On Oct 14, 2006, at 5:31 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
> # Malloc > sage: time test_sage_add() > CPU times: user 9.82 s, sys: 0.03 s, total: 9.85 s > > # PyMem_Malloc > sage: time test_sage_add() > CPU times: user 9.87 s, sys: 0.02 s, total: 9.89 s > > # omalloc > sage: time test_sage_add() > CPU times: user 8.12 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 8.13 s That's pretty impressive! So it seems if we want to get any faster than that, we need to work on the Python object construction stuff. To be honest, I'm a bit sick of thinking about that at the moment. It's something we could come back to later. I think we have enough work to do implementing more widely the stuff we worked on at SAGE days 2. Try a sage -t on the whole library with omalloc, and if that works, I say patch it in permanently. David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
