Thanks guys. Based on what I've read so far about VCSs and especially about git I know that I can 'fork'/'clone' the repository but I still didn't get the answer (or I am too thick to get it) that I am looking for.
Fred, I thought branches are just used for development that later on have to be merged to the master/trunk. If that is the case a branch would not be a 'version'/'fork' from the main vanilla version because in the end it would end up merging. I might have misunderstood what you were saying? I also understand that any change to the code would have to be determined to be a 'vanilla' feature or a specific one to the client(s) using a particular version of the application. What I need is to know if it is possible to 'push' out mods from the vanilla version to the other ones and which VCS would allow that. I am very new to this so I might not understand *how to* do it yet but I need sort of a yes/no answer to at least know if that is possible, and optionally if it can be more or less automated. Once I have that answer it would just be a matter of getting deep into learning the tool. Thanks so much guys. Pepe On Apr 10, 9:12 am, Michael Pavling <pavl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10 April 2010 03:25, pepe <p...@betterrpg.com> wrote: > > > Also take into consideration that we have never used a version control > > system so my questions might just be due to lack of knowledge and/or > > understanding as of how to use the VCS. > > Well, distributed version control is going to be your friend here, but > you are going from a standing start to pretty much the most > complicated use of it. > > Personally, I'm a Mercurial fan, but Git is very similar. Either way, > both tools allow developers to maintain their own clones of a central > repository, and to make as many commits as they like to give them a > safety net as they work. At whatever interval (normally for me, it's > when a "feature" is working and passing tests) their local changes are > pushed up to the repository (and merged if necessary, but if they've > been doing lots of little commits, the merge is often done for you). > > At that point, cloning out features to the other branches would need > to be done (probably by a dedicated person who knows the individual > systems well). "propagate those changes selectively" is almost > certainly going to mean a large level of manual intervention, but > again, this is much easier to decipher with the incremental commits > that become the signature of DVCS. > > Check outwww.hginit.comfor a very good "getting started" guide for Mercurial. > I use a "Turnkey Linux" server for my Mercurial machine, but you can > install it on anything and configure yourself. The benefit of the > Turnkey machine is that you get up and running in about 15mins, and > can play with a few different systems for > comparison.http://www.turnkeylinux.org/revision-control -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.