I'm a fan of the singular vs. plural thing. It makes sense to me and while it's true that it doesn't hold up the "each level of the url must be meaningful", very few apps do.
As for the uncountability thing, I wonder how many people actually use uncountable names as resources. Also, the routing could force devs to disambiguate when given an uncountable resource name. -bd On Aug 1, 2:24 pm, "Chris Wanstrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/1/07, Tom Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Collections: > > > /posts/tagged/ruby > > /posts/from/2007/12 > > /posts/written-by/tomafro > > /users > > > Individual items: > > > /user/tomafro > > /post/1 > > For anyone interested:http://pastie.caboo.se/84170 > > Tested on 1.2.3, not sure about edge (but probably works). > > -- > Chris Wanstrathhttp://errfree.com//http://errtheblog.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
