On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:59 AM, Chris Wanstrath wrote:
>
> Has anyone run into this issue and is there a sanctioned way to handle
> it? I'd ask for the semicolon back, but I doubt that'll happen.
Oh no, please don't bring the semicolon back.
Maybe we can add something to routing to make it easier to use an
alternative to the resource name for the route. For intance, a
solution might look like this.
map.resources :users, :name_prefix => 'u'
map.nice_user 'users/:id', :controller => 'users', :method => 'show'
Which would create routes for:
/users/chris
/u/1/edit
/u/12
Manfred
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
