Hi Joel

As I mentioned earlier, the goal of the draft is to solicit this type of 
feedback.
Our goal is to find best way to move forward.
Appreciate the feedback.

Thanks

Regards … Zafar

From: Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 12:58 PM
To: Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com>, rtgwg@ietf.org <rtgwg@ietf.org>, 
spr...@ietf.org <spr...@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] Re: [rtgwg] RPC for programming ephemeral routing states

I don't think that ignoring consistency follows.  The combined (long term plus 
ephemeral) state still has to be valid and operable.  Pretending that the 
controller will always send only correct ephemeral changes seems an invitation 
to trouble.  But the main point is that you need to make the argument in the 
draft, not that you need to convince me.

Yours,

Joel
On 3/19/2025 1:53 AM, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
Hi Joel

As this is for ephemeral state, the consistency check with the configuration is 
not required.

Thanks

Regards … Zafar

From: Joel Halpern 
<jmh.dir...@joelhalpern.com><mailto:jmh.dir...@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 11:38 AM
To: Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com><mailto:z...@cisco.com>, 
rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org> <rtgwg@ietf.org><mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>, 
spr...@ietf.org<mailto:spr...@ietf.org> 
<spr...@ietf.org><mailto:spr...@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtgwg] RPC for programming ephemeral routing states

My understanding is that part of the reason people are often moving to restconf 
is that the protocol exchanges are somewhat simpler.  Note that the significant 
delay I have heard about is often in the processing system and consistency 
checks, and moving to restconf, or gRPC, or ... does not change that.

Yours,

Joel
On 3/19/2025 12:27 AM, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
Hi Joel

Many thanks for your comments; much appreciated.
The goal of the draft is to solicit this type of feedback. MANY THANKS!

The draft talks about applicability of the Yang over Netconf (I know you 
mentioned RESTCONF).

Specifically, the Netconf route is slow and unpredictable for real-time 
applications like tactical traffic engineering
I am not an expert in manageability, but I am afraid RESTCONF would have the 
same issue?

Looking forward to your/ WGs feedback on how to take this work forward.

Thanks

Regards … Zafar

From: Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com><mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Saturday, March 8, 2025 at 2:10 PM
To: Zafar Ali (zali) <z...@cisco.com><mailto:z...@cisco.com>, 
rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org> <rtgwg@ietf.org><mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>, 
spr...@ietf.org<mailto:spr...@ietf.org> 
<spr...@ietf.org><mailto:spr...@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtgwg] RPC for programming ephemeral routing states

One thing I missed in reading this draft is why this was better than existing 
tools, e.g. YANG over RESTCONF.  For which we know the integration with the 
rest of the operational environment.  (I can believe there is an advantage, but 
I couldn't tell what it was.)

Yours,

Joel
On 3/8/2025 1:04 PM, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
Hi,

Recently, the industry has witnessed increasing use cases where a controller 
needs to install ephemeral routing states in the network. Protocol use requires 
the controller to implement laborious encoding, decoding, serialization of data 
streams, etc.



We have written a generic draft of routing RPC API for programming ephemeral 
routing states, using SR policy programming as an example.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ali-spring-sr-policy-programming-rpc/.

It aims to ease the programming of ephemeral routing states in the network 
using an SDN controller.



We request a review and discussion on how to forward the work to the IETF. We 
will present it at the upcoming RTGWG meeting.



Thanks



Regards ... Zafar (on behalf of co-authors)



_______________________________________________

rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>

To unsubscribe send an email to 
rtgwg-le...@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-le...@ietf.org>



_______________________________________________

spring mailing list -- spr...@ietf.org<mailto:spr...@ietf.org>

To unsubscribe send an email to 
spring-le...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-le...@ietf.org>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rtgwg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to