Dear Authors et al., thank you for delivering a well-written and useful specification. I support the publication of the draft. One minor note on wording used in Section 4.3. I interpret "both sides of an interface", "each side of the interface" as reference to a BFD peer. If that is the case, perhaps a minor editorial update to the common terminology would be helpful.
Regards, Greg On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 1:18 PM Reshad Rahman <reshad= 40yahoo....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > <Re-resend since first 2 attempts seem to have gone to /dev/null> > > BFD WG, > > This email (re)starts a 2 week Working Group Last Call for "BFD > encapsulated in large packets": > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets/ > > > Please take the time to review the document and provide comments by May > 24th. Feedback such as "I believe the document is ready to advance" is also > welcome. > > FYI we did WGLC a few years ago, see previous discussions at > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/rjyxii23qp8-EQSZQ7d8631kMwY/ > > There is no known IPR for this document: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/jaAjdrkePSocqvvcxt4ffx0NDg8/ > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/0yfGFB-ywYQMQWledrRRLXhrVYY/ > > > Regards, > Reshad (co-chair). > > > > > >
