Mach, Thanks for the comment.
I believe it's the case that the abbreviations that haven't been expanded fall under the RFC Editor's well known abbreviations: https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt Note the category with the asterisk (*) character that they are fine with not expanding. With regard to the capitalization, I think there's sufficient inconsistency across the series that it's my somewhat lazy preference to defer this point to the RFC Editor who will have final call on which forms and style to use. That is, I could make the suggested change but suspect the RFC Editor may change it anyway. -- Jeff > On May 20, 2024, at 10:57 PM, Mach Chen > <mach.chen=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I read the latest version of the draft, it’s well written and easy to read. I > think it’s useful solution and ready to move forward. > > Some nits: > - It’s better to expand the abbreviations (e.g., MTU, PDU, etc.) > when first use. > - s/path MTU/Path MTU (PMTU) when first use, and using PMTU in later > places, to keep the consistence with the usage in other RFCs. > > Best regards, > Mach > > From: Reshad Rahman <reshad=40yahoo....@dmarc.ietf.org > <mailto:reshad=40yahoo....@dmarc.ietf.org>> > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2024 4:16 AM > To: BFD WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>> > Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets > > <Re-resend since first 2 attempts seem to have gone to /dev/null> > > BFD WG, > > This email (re)starts a 2 week Working Group Last Call for "BFD encapsulated > in large packets": > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets/> > > > Please take the time to review the document and provide comments by May 24th. > Feedback such as "I believe the document is ready to advance" is also welcome. > > FYI we did WGLC a few years ago, see previous discussions at > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/rjyxii23qp8-EQSZQ7d8631kMwY/ > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/rjyxii23qp8-EQSZQ7d8631kMwY/> > > There is no known IPR for this document: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/jaAjdrkePSocqvvcxt4ffx0NDg8/ > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/jaAjdrkePSocqvvcxt4ffx0NDg8/> > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/0yfGFB-ywYQMQWledrRRLXhrVYY/ > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/0yfGFB-ywYQMQWledrRRLXhrVYY/> > > > Regards, > Reshad (co-chair).
