I'll address the comment below on missing normative reference to 8349 and will
upload 08. I believe the other comments have been addressed in the copy in
github.
Regards,Reshad.
On Friday, November 26, 2021, 11:08:11 AM EST, Jeffrey Haas
<[email protected]> wrote:
[Largely for the WG mail list archive.]
On Nov 26, 2021, at 7:26 AM, t petch <[email protected]> wrote:
On 15/10/2021 20:18, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
I encourage the Working Group to review the draft and the comments to date.
After resolving them, I believe we're ready to have a shepherd writeup and
send this to the IESG.
Jeff
My comments from 28oct21 and thereabouts, some of which were first made in
August 2020, have not been addressed (or are being ignored:-(
I still have your comments queued up as "must be addressed before we ship the
document". And, if you'll check your inbox, you should find some edits form
Reshad that will address most of those. Please review and Reshad can post them
for broader WG review.
It's not unusual for IETF to have extra latency this time of year. I've even
given a presentation on the the timing impacts of the last few months during
IETF WG chairs training on project management. :-)
While this is moving about as fast as an attempt to reach the far end of a
hallway during an IETF cookie break, please have some patience. We want to
make sure your comments are addressed.
-- Jeff
