+1 > On Mar 22, 2021, at 9:29 AM, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD module, > so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress. > > Thanks, > Yingzhen > >> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch <ie...@btconnect.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Reshad Rahman >> <reshad=40yahoo....@dmarc.ietf.org> >> Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58 >> To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org >> Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110 >> >> BFD WG, >> >> Draft minutes have been posted @ >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/ >> >> Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd. >> <tp> >> >> I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD >> YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can >> progress. >> >> Tom Petch >> >> Copying the LSR WG. >> >> >> Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0 >> >> Regards, >> Reshad. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsr mailing list >> l...@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >
Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com
