Hi, I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD module, so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.
Thanks, Yingzhen > On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch <ie...@btconnect.com> wrote: > > > > From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Reshad Rahman > <reshad=40yahoo....@dmarc.ietf.org> > Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58 > To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org > Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110 > > BFD WG, > > Draft minutes have been posted @ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/ > > Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd. > <tp> > > I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD > YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can > progress. > > Tom Petch > > Copying the LSR WG. > > > Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0 > > Regards, > Reshad. > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > l...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
