Hi Alvaro, thank you for your suggestion. I'll update the reference to RFC 5881. And I've realized that GTSM is not used anywhere else in the document. Cleaned it up. I will try to make the new update before the cut-off date.
Regards, Greg On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 11:25 AM Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > On January 27, 2020 at 5:44:24 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote: > > > Greg: > > Hi! > > > below are the proposed changes to address the IP TTL/Hop Limit open issue > > I didn't see a discussion on the list, but since I'm holding the DISCUSS... > > Your proposed changes are fine, just one nit: > > ... > > NEW TEXT: > > TTL or Hop Limit: MUST be set to 255 in accordance with the > > Generalized TTL Security Mechanism (GTSM) [RFC5082]. > > I think that a better reference would be rfc5881. > > > I will clear my DISCUSS once the WG confirms, and you submit an update. > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 2:11 PM Jeffrey Haas wrote: > ... > > > > > > Open Issue 1: Discussion on TTL/Hop Limit = 1 > > > > > > Proposed Action: Greg has proposed text he will send to the working > group > > > suggesting GTSM procedures be utilized. The expected concern is how > this > > > impacts existing implementations. >
