On January 27, 2020 at 5:44:24 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
Greg: Hi! > below are the proposed changes to address the IP TTL/Hop Limit open issue I didn't see a discussion on the list, but since I'm holding the DISCUSS... Your proposed changes are fine, just one nit: .... > NEW TEXT: > TTL or Hop Limit: MUST be set to 255 in accordance with the > Generalized TTL Security Mechanism (GTSM) [RFC5082]. I think that a better reference would be rfc5881. I will clear my DISCUSS once the WG confirms, and you submit an update. Thanks! Alvaro. > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 2:11 PM Jeffrey Haas wrote: .... > > > > Open Issue 1: Discussion on TTL/Hop Limit = 1 > > > > Proposed Action: Greg has proposed text he will send to the working group > > suggesting GTSM procedures be utilized. The expected concern is how this > > impacts existing implementations.
