On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 2:26 AM, Jeffrey Haas <jh...@pfrc.org> wrote:
Santosh,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:24:06PM +0530, Santosh P K wrote:
"As per section 4 inner destination IP address MAY be set to 127/8
address.
There could be firewall configured on VTEP to block 127/8 address
range if
set as destination IP in inner IP header. It is recommended to
allow 127/8
range address through firewall only if inner IP header's
destination IP is
set to 127/8 IP address."
Would it be reasonable to suggest "SHOULD be set"?
This sounds reasonable to me.
Dinesh
Our motivation in this section is to offer what is likely to be a
reasonable
default, without providing restriction from something more amenable
to some
provider's requirement.
Similarly, based on this text, we'll get asked about "recommended" vs.
"RECOMMENDED". What level of strength do you think we should have
here?
-- Jeff
