Greg, these changes are good with me. Regards, Reshad.
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> Date: Monday, January 29, 2018 at 1:04 PM To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrah...@cisco.com> Cc: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpign...@cisco.com>, Jeffrey Haas <jh...@pfrc.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org> Subject: Re: WGLC for BFD Multipoint documents (last round) Hi Reshad, nits fixed and the new text below: OLD TEXT A number of values of the state variable are added to the base BFD… NEW TEXT A number of new values of the state variable bfd.SessionType are added to the base BFD… Would you accept this update? Regards, Greg On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrah...@cisco.com<mailto:rrah...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Greg, * Section 4.2. s/The head has a session of type MultipointHead Section 4.4.1/ The head has a session of type MultipointHead, as defined in Section 4.4.1, / * Section 4.4.1. “A number of values of the state variable are added to the base BFD…”. That sentence needs rewording IMO but maybe I’m just missing what it’s trying to convey. * Section 4.6. s/Active role , / Active role, / * Section 4.10. “MUST send packets with P bit set.”. Did we agree on “MUST send packets with the P bit set.”? Regards, Reshad. <snip>
