As author of this draft I support this draft to. E adopted as working group draft.
On Jan 20, 2018 5:31 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <a...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > I finally read this draft and support WG adoption (even though I’m NOT a > fan of VXLAN, I realize it is a popular deployment scenario). > Thanks, > Acee > > On 1/3/18, 10:45 AM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Jeffrey Haas" < > rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of jh...@pfrc.org> wrote: > > Working Group, > > As a reminder, we have an active adoption call for the BFD for vxlan > document. We've seen support for it on the list, but a few more people > offering commentary from outside of the author's list would be > helpful. :-) > > -- Jeff > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 07:15:17AM -0800, IETF Secretariat wrote: > > The BFD WG has placed draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan in state > > Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Jeffrey Haas) > > > > The document is available at > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan/ > > > > Comment: > > The authors of draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan have asked for adoption > of their > > draft by the BFD working group. The BFD working group is chosen > because the > > document has implications on base RFC 5880 procedures. > > > > Given the nature of the document, co-review and coordinated working > group > > last call with the nvo3 Working Group is expected. > > > > The last date for comments for this adoption is January 20. This > extended > > period is intended to accommodate end of year holidays. > > > > A final note is that adoption is contingent upon our AD confirming > this is > > within current WG charter, or permitting us otherwise to re-charter > > appropriately. > > > >
