Hi Jeff,
I finally read this draft and support WG adoption (even though I’m NOT a fan of
VXLAN, I realize it is a popular deployment scenario).
Thanks,
Acee
On 1/3/18, 10:45 AM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Jeffrey Haas"
<rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of jh...@pfrc.org> wrote:
Working Group,
As a reminder, we have an active adoption call for the BFD for vxlan
document. We've seen support for it on the list, but a few more people
offering commentary from outside of the author's list would be helpful. :-)
-- Jeff
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 07:15:17AM -0800, IETF Secretariat wrote:
> The BFD WG has placed draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan in state
> Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Jeffrey Haas)
>
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan/
>
> Comment:
> The authors of draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan have asked for adoption of
their
> draft by the BFD working group. The BFD working group is chosen because
the
> document has implications on base RFC 5880 procedures.
>
> Given the nature of the document, co-review and coordinated working group
> last call with the nvo3 Working Group is expected.
>
> The last date for comments for this adoption is January 20. This extended
> period is intended to accommodate end of year holidays.
>
> A final note is that adoption is contingent upon our AD confirming this is
> within current WG charter, or permitting us otherwise to re-charter
> appropriately.
