Yes/support On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 00:24 Santosh P K <santosh.pallaga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I support for WG adoption. > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Zhangmingui (Martin) < > zhangmin...@huawei.com> wrote: > >> The use case is meaningful and the document is neatly organized. Support >> for adoption. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mingui >> >> >> >> *From:* Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *MALLIK >> MUDIGONDA (mmudigon) >> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 27, 2017 10:23 PM >> *To:* Jeffrey Haas; rtg-bfd@ietf.org; >> draft-spallagatti-bfd-vx...@ietf.org >> *Subject:* Re: BFD WG Call For Adoption draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan >> >> >> >> >> Hi Jeff, Reashad, et. al, I support the adoption >> of draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan. >> >> >> Regards, Mallik The BFD WG has placed draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan in >> state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" >> >> IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org> Thu, 21 December 2017 >> 15:15 UTCShow header >> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=rtg-bfd> >> >> The BFD WG has placed draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan in state >> >> Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Jeffrey Haas) >> >> >> >> The document is available at >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan/ >> >> >> >> Comment: >> >> The authors of draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan have asked for adoption of their >> >> draft by the BFD working group. The BFD working group is chosen because the >> >> document has implications on base RFC 5880 procedures. >> >> >> >> Given the nature of the document, co-review and coordinated working group >> >> last call with the nvo3 Working Group is expected. >> >> >> >> The last date for comments for this adoption is January 20. This extended >> >> period is intended to accommodate end of year holidays. >> >> >> >> A final note is that adoption is contingent upon our AD confirming this is >> >> within current WG charter, or permitting us otherwise to re-charter >> >> appropriately. >> >> >> > >
