I support for WG adoption. On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Zhangmingui (Martin) < zhangmin...@huawei.com> wrote:
> The use case is meaningful and the document is neatly organized. Support > for adoption. > > > > Thanks, > > Mingui > > > > *From:* Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *MALLIK > MUDIGONDA (mmudigon) > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 27, 2017 10:23 PM > *To:* Jeffrey Haas; rtg-bfd@ietf.org; draft-spallagatti-bfd-vx...@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: BFD WG Call For Adoption draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan > > > > > Hi Jeff, Reashad, et. al, I support the adoption > of draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan. > > > Regards, Mallik The BFD WG has placed draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan in > state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" > > IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org> Thu, 21 December 2017 > 15:15 UTCShow header > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=rtg-bfd> > > The BFD WG has placed draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan in state > > Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Jeffrey Haas) > > > > The document is available at > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan/ > > > > Comment: > > The authors of draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan have asked for adoption of their > > draft by the BFD working group. The BFD working group is chosen because the > > document has implications on base RFC 5880 procedures. > > > > Given the nature of the document, co-review and coordinated working group > > last call with the nvo3 Working Group is expected. > > > > The last date for comments for this adoption is January 20. This extended > > period is intended to accommodate end of year holidays. > > > > A final note is that adoption is contingent upon our AD confirming this is > > within current WG charter, or permitting us otherwise to re-charter > > appropriately. > > >
