> is it as simple as taking the PR and changing the type name? I need to look, but probably not - else I would have done it.
> > given that we don't have an existing name-value type, what backwards > compatibility broke? We already have one, the iptables type. Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
