> note that I know I've seen patches go by for the name-value type, but I'm not > seeing it in the documentation at > https://www.liblognorm.com/files/manual/configuration.html#field-types > > @rainer, have those patches not made it to a release?
IIRC no, because they broke backwards compatibility and no effort was made to use a new type for that. IIRC ;-) Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
