* "rsync.project via rsync" <CAJnOL=pWrPBEdwFTMY7mnKkgt997QG7s+5JRg=f8zxgdca0...@mail.gmail.com> : Wrote on Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:34:10 +1100:
> sorry about the prefix changes in rsync-patches. We're going to be dropping > the whole rsync-patches system soon anyway, as it really isn't working > well. It was supposed to be a staging area where users would test the > patches before being considered for the main release, but we haven't really > received any feedback on the patches, so not serving a useful purpose now. > I'll probably stop updating it for the next release. There had been no commits on the github site https://github.com/WayneD/rsync-patches.git since 04-2024, so I thought it was already defunct, maybe the development happens elswewhere? I was surprised to hear of the tarball. fwiw I've been a staple consumer of clone-dest direct-io downdate omit-dir-changes, at least until 3.3.0. > On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 08:57, Ryan Carsten Schmidt <rs...@ryandesign.com> > wrote: > >> The patches within the rsync-patches-3.4.0.tar.gz archive seem to contain >> new unnecessary hunks that change the prefix from /usr to /usr/local. This >> was not the case in 3.3.0. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
