I don't have a Mac to test on. If you have a Mac maybe you could test and open a PR against rsync for the change?
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 10:12, Ryan Carsten Schmidt <rs...@ryandesign.com> wrote: > On Jan 14, 2025, at 16:34, rsync.project wrote: > > > sorry about the prefix changes in rsync-patches. > > > No problem; those changes were easy to remove from the fileflags patch. > > We're going to be dropping the whole rsync-patches system soon anyway, as > it really isn't working well. It was supposed to be a staging area where > users would test the patches before being considered for the main release, > but we haven't really received any feedback on the patches, so not serving > a useful purpose now. I'll probably stop updating it for the next release. > > > MacPorts has been shipping rsync to users with fileflags.diff since 2008: > > #15472 (rsync-3.0.3 should fully preserve Mac OS X metadata) > <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/15472> > trac.macports.org <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/15472> > [image: macports.ico] <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/15472> > <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/15472> > > > How about incorporating that patch into rsync proper, once it's fixed? I > don't want to become responsible for maintaining your patches for you. > > The other patch discussed in that ticket, crtimes.diff, was already > incorporated into rsync in 3.2.3. >
macports.ico
Description: Binary data
-- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
