Ethan Sommer <e5ten.a...@gmail.com> (So 17 Nov 2019 10:08:16 CST): > > Me? I think, the rsync maintainers, or? > > I just added my 2 cents and would stick with .pl, it has proven to be > > stable :) (Yes, I'm a Perl user.) > Meant to direct that towards the rsync maintainers sorry. Are you > suggesting that something that works with all popular awk > implementations and entirely conforms to the POSIX standard now would > somehow not be stable, or would eventually stop working, as if awk is a > moving target?
No, I just do not see the point in replacing a working script with another working script. Though I understand your concerns about the build dependencies. OTOH, having Perl on a build machine seems to be quite common nowadays (as having AWK). And if I recall well, that "issue" was about the *build* deps. Personally I do not care for *this* project, as I'm not involved. Greetings, -- Heiko
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
