Paul Slootman <paul+rs...@wurtel.net> wrote: > On Sat 15 Feb 2014, Perry Hutchison wrote: > > Hiroyuki Ikegami <ike...@mixallow.net> wrote: > > > 2014-02-15 7:39 GMT+09:00 Grozdan <neutri...@gmail.com>: > > > > Yesterday, I changed my rsyncd.conf file to add one more module to it. > > > > Then I sent a kill -HUP $pid signal to rsync running in daemon mode, > > > > but what gives? It just died so I had to start it up again. I though > > > > sending a HUP would just make it reload its config file, no? > > > > > > Many softwares catches SIGHUP as a trigger to reload configurations. > > > But it is a kind of software design. If the programmer does not want > > > to write signal handling code, the programs received HUP just dies. > > > > This really ought to go on the to-do list. It is a very > > longstanding convention that a daemon should reinitialize itself > > (for some reasonable definition of reinitialize) upon receiving > > a SIGHUP. > > Why should the code be modified to help those that don't read > the docs properly? > > From the rsyncd.conf manpage: > > Note that you should not send the rsync daemon a HUP signal to force it > to reread the rsyncd.conf file. The file is re-read on each client con- > nection.
Because "kill -HUP" after editing a config file is a standard administrative workflow. Google "Principle Of Least Astonishment". Since rsyncd already reinitializes itself on each connection, all that's needed is for it to ignore SIGHUP: #include <signal.h> ... signal(SIGHUP, SIG_IGN); -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html