https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3271
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-02 18:05 MST -------
Thanks for the suggested patches. I agree that those continue statements after
select() returns -1 look like they should be improved, but I'm not sure why you
allowed the code in the read_timeout() function to fall through after an error:
the bit-field values will be left undefined by the error, so I think we need
more code to figure out what to do. Perhaps we should change the code to only
continue if count is 0 or if errno is EINTR, EWOULDBLOCK, or EAGAIN (and exit
with an error on all other errno values).
In the writefd_unbuffered() function, what errno is being returned when your
new code is being triggered?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
