Phil Howard wrote...
> I have some very large directories I'd like to syncronize. Total time to
> scan through these millions of files is a substantial portion of an hour
> or even exceeds it. It just goes slower if these large critical time blocks
> have to be done sequentially.
Yeah, same here.
> It would also be nice if rsync didn't have to collect the entire tree in
> RAM all at once, but instead, both source and destination could recurse
> their respective trees in sync with each other and copy, create, delete,
> as things go through that parallel recursion.
I'm not sure, perhaps hard link preservation would cause some headache
here. But as long as you're not using -H at all, there shouldn't be a
principal problem.
Christoph
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
