https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-26 01:26 ------- I believe that using this "no-op" packet effectively implements the "keep alive" option requested in bug 1889 without requiring an explicit option be given. Nice. I'm glad you decided to do this, given that the protocol number is being bumped anyway due to other changes. But just to be clear - this is not a fix for the bug originally reported, where the hang occurs at the end, correct? Also - is there a default for timeout/2 if no --timeout value has been given? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
