https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-26 13:45 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> I believe that using this "no-op" packet effectively implements
> the "keep alive" option requested in bug 1889 without requiring
> an explicit option be given.
It did once I moved the calls to the file-deletion passes into the generator (so
that things were setup properly for the new keep-alive packet to be used).
> But just to be clear - this is not a fix for the bug originally reported,
> where the hang occurs at the end, correct?
It might have. I am now theorizing that the original bug's timeout could have
occurred during the directory-time-touching loop at the end of the generator's
run. If so, the latest CVS code now handles this for a protocol-29 transfer.
On this assumption, I'm closing this bug. Please reopen it if there is still a
problem with 2.6.4 (you can try out the latest "nightly" tar file to test it
now).
> Also - is there a default for timeout/2 if no --timeout value has been given?
If no --timeout has been given, no keep-alive packets are currently sent.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
