> > On 20 May 2009, at 00:04, aslak hellesoy wrote: > >>> Any further thoughts on this, Aslak? I'd prefer to go with a solution in >>> line with the future direction of Cucumber if possible. >>> >> >> Sorry, forgot to get back to you Luke. >> >> I'm convinced. We'll add an AfterStep hook. Do you want to give a stab >> at a patch? Start by writing a feature - see >> features/after_block_exceptions.feature for a good example of the >> style we like... > > Can I make a mild plea for After(:step) rather than AfterStep? I think it > looks nicer and it's one less method added to the API... >
That would be confusing, since After already takes arguments (tags). Aslak > Matt Wynne > http://beta.songkick.com > http://blog.mattwynne.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
