On 20 May 2009, at 00:04, aslak hellesoy wrote:

Any further thoughts on this, Aslak? I'd prefer to go with a solution in
line with the future direction of Cucumber if possible.


Sorry, forgot to get back to you Luke.

I'm convinced. We'll add an AfterStep hook. Do you want to give a stab
at a patch? Start by writing a feature - see
features/after_block_exceptions.feature for a good example of the
style we like...

Can I make a mild plea for After(:step) rather than AfterStep? I think it looks nicer and it's one less method added to the API...

Matt Wynne
http://beta.songkick.com
http://blog.mattwynne.net



_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to