> -----Original Message-----
> From: rspec-users-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:rspec-users-
> boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Dan North
> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 10:00 PM
> To: rspec-users
> Subject: Re: [rspec-users] BDD for C#?
> 
> Hi Brandon.
> 
> I already replied on the BDD list but can I suggest you give the
> nbehave guys a poke, or even get involved in helping them out?
> 
> If they started getting some releases out it would really help build
> some momentum around it.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dan
> 

Yeah, I think I will. It looks like the best right now, anyway.

I'm not sure I could help much, though I could perhaps help with
documentation if anything, but I will contact them.

Thanks,
Brandon

> 
> 2009/4/28 Brandon Olivares <programmer2...@gmail.com>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       > -----Original Message-----
>       > From: rspec-users-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:rspec-users-
>       > boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of aslak hellesoy
> 
>       > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 11:51 AM
>       > To: rspec-users
>       > Subject: Re: [rspec-users] BDD for C#?
>       >
>       >
>       >
> 
>       > I think you mean: "Does IronRuby work along with RSpec". The
> answer is
>       > *maybe*. IronRuby doesn't work with most things yet.
>       >
> 
> 
>       For now, the answer appears to be no, unfortunately. I'll have to
> come back
>       to it in a few months when it's hopefully more stable.
> 
>       NBehave looks really nice, but unfortunately there is really no
>       documentation for it at all, except for a few examples of usage.
> I think
>       it's either that or NUnit with naming conventions, but I really
> like the
>       scenario support in NBehave.
> 
>       Brandon
> 
> 
>       > Step definitions would have to be written in Ruby until I
> implement
>       > something similar to cucumber_java (cucumber_dotnet), which
> would let
>       > you write step definitions in any .NET language that supports
> an
>       > annotation mechanism.
>       >
>       > Aslak
>       >
>       >
>       >
>       >
>       >       I might try it, if I can find a way to do acceptance
> tests for
>       > this
>       >       application. It might not be as hard as I thought.
>       >
>       >       Brandon
>       >
>       >
>       >       > Aslak
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       >       Not port or link, replicate. It's only like ~10
> features,
>       > right?
>       >       > I don't know C#, but I could do it in C++ in a couple
> days.
>       >       >
>       >       >       --
>       >       >        Phlip
>       >       >        http://flea.sourceforge.net/resume.html
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       >       _______________________________________________
>       >       >       rspec-users mailing list
>       >       >       rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>       >       >       http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >
>       >
>       >       www.perpetualseeker.com
>       >       Blog about college, programming, and other random things.
>       >       Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/devbanana
>       >
>       >
>       >       _______________________________________________
>       >
>       >       rspec-users mailing list
>       >       rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>       >       http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>       >
>       >
> 
>       www.perpetualseeker.com
>       Blog about college, programming, and other random things.
>       Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/devbanana
> 
> 
>       _______________________________________________
>       rspec-users mailing list
>       rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>       http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> 
> 

www.perpetualseeker.com
Blog about college, programming, and other random things.
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/devbanana


_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to