On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:16 PM, James Byrne <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote: > David Chelimsky wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, James Byrne <li...@ruby-forum.com> >> wrote: >>> David Chelimsky wrote: >>> >>>> I'd rather always define our own so the results are consistent from >>>> RSpec regardless of other frameworks in the midst. Does that make >>>> sense to you? >>> >>> Instead of metaclass how about object_handle ? >>> >>> wdt? >> >> Go for it. I think that's good enough for now. It's for internal >> consumption only. Also, I'm better at making naming decisions when I >> see things in context, I may change it later if I come up w/ something >> that speaks to me more clearly. >> >> Good? > > OK. I have made the changes to the code in a local branch. I just need > to stick the object_handle method in the right place and get the revised > specs to pass. I should have a patch for you tomorrow. If not, then by > Monday.
Cool. I may need to get a release out before the weekend due to other pressures, so this might not make it until the next release, but that won't be too far off. Thanks James, David > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
