On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, James Byrne <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote: > David Chelimsky wrote: > >> I'd rather always define our own so the results are consistent from >> RSpec regardless of other frameworks in the midst. Does that make >> sense to you? > > Instead of metaclass how about object_handle ? > > wdt?
Go for it. I think that's good enough for now. It's for internal consumption only. Also, I'm better at making naming decisions when I see things in context, I may change it later if I come up w/ something that speaks to me more clearly. Good? > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users