On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Yi Wen <hayafi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I totally agree with you on this. I have a feeling a lot of people kind of > use cucumber as a sexy way for doing waterfall.
That may be so, but one view of agile is that each iteration is a mini-waterfall. BDD suggests that we *should* define all of the scenarios in the iteration planning meeting because we use them as a planning tool (how can we estimate a feature at all before we've talked about the acceptance criteria?). FWIW, David > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Mark Wilden <m...@mwilden.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:36 PM, aslak hellesoy >> <aslak.helle...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > You don't have to write all >> > scenarios when you start working on a feature. I recommend you never >> > have more than one yellow scenario at a time. >> >> Whereas I use scenarios as a "to-do" list. I'll keep adding them as I >> think of them or as they come up in discussion. >> >> ///ark >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
